School Board Orders Global Warming Class to Include Conservative Views

Los Alamitos Unified will require teachers of controversial subjects to prove political balance to the school board each year.

Before science teachers can tackle topics such as global warming, they will have to demonstrate to the school board that the course is politically balanced.

A new environmental science course prompted the on Tuesday to rewrite its policy for teaching controversial subject matter. Concerned that "liberal" faculty members could skew lessons on global warming, the board of education voted 4-0 to make teachers give an annual presentation on how they're teaching the class. 

“I believe my role in the board is to represent the conservative voice of the community and I’m not a big fan of global warming,” board member Jeffrey Barke, who led the effort but didn't attend Tuesday's meeting, said in a telephone interview. “The teachers wanted [the class], and we want a review of how they are teaching it.”

The high school will begin offering an advanced-placement environmental science course next fall. Based on demand elsewhere in California, district officials expect it to be popular—more than 15,000 public school students enrolled in the class in 2008-09.

Although there is a consensus among scientists, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science, that global climate change exists, the board of education said the topic is controversial enough to require a change in the district's policy.

The new class will be the first for which district teachers must prove political balance to the school board.

“Most teachers are left to center, and if we leave it to teachers to impose their liberal views, then it would make for an unbalanced lesson,” Barke said. “Some people believe that global warming is a crock of crap, and others are zealots.”


The course also covers topics such as population dynamics, evolution and biodiversity, pollution, ozone depletion and human health and toxicity.

“We define a topic to be controversial if it has more than one widely held view,” said Assistant Superintendent when Superintendent Gregory Franklin steps down at the end of the school year. “There are many issues regarding the environment that have become politicized these days and we want kids to be exposed to all sides.”

School officials said the class is a good alternative for students looking to add an alternative AP course to their schedules.

“Our goal is to have every high school student complete at least one AP course, and this is a good one to take because it is not heavily math-based,” said Kropp. “We are excited to offer it.”

The textbook that will be used, “Living in the Environment,” asks students to analyze why some issues are deemed controversial (such as wilderness protection) and explores how population growth and climate change can cause species extinctions.

“If the textbook talks about the evil adventures of humanity, we want teachers to describe an opposing view,” Barke said. “Teachers and textbooks are biased.”  

Los Alamitos Unified isn't the first district to raise concerns regarding how environmental science courses are taught. The Texas board of education, for example, mandated that teachers present “all sides” of issues that include global warming. South Dakota public schools are also required to teach climate skepticism, according to a report from the New York Times.

Still, this might be the first time a California public school takes such a stand.

“I don’t have data to share on this, but every subject area has its own set of controversies,” said Thomas Adams, director of standards, curriculum frameworks and instructional resources for the California Department of Education.  

Kropp said, “An unbalanced lesson would portray only one side. All we want is to have teachers teach the various scientific theories out there.” 

More on the Global Warming Class:

More Good Reads on Los Alamitos-Seal Beach Patch:

Earick Ward August 22, 2011 at 07:49 PM
No, let's instead "have faith" that science will find the answer to the creation of the universe and of man. Do you have the answer of the "something from nothing" hypothosis? Or, the mapping of the "millions" of life forms that exist? As to working for the chinese, that could only come about if we continue to borrow, to serve the "looter class" of American society.
Paige Austin September 27, 2011 at 05:40 PM
Los Alamitos School Board reverses it's controversial topics policy, backing off stance on global warming. Science teachers won't have to automatically appear before the board to present a politically balanced curriculum: http://losalamitos.patch.com/articles/school-board-to-tackle-controversial-global-warming-policy
Tim November 25, 2011 at 11:54 AM
More damaging revelations on how global warming scientists have been a fraud: "Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data." Read it a weep! http://tjo.me/upjD0w
Jeffrey Visser March 21, 2012 at 01:03 PM
The truth is, we don't know much about Global Warming yet. It's still a relatively new study within science, and to be honest it's not a very exact science. Let's just stick to real proven stuff like maths and chemistry. Global warming discussions belong in academic circles where the debate is still going on strongly. Why introduce such an unstable and erratic subject in high school classes anyway? Everybody is shouting something different. At www.documentaryz.com for example, a website to watch free documentaries online, there are lots of independent filmmakers who are on the conservative side, and what they're telling me seems logical enough, even though they lack all credentials real scientists have. I don't know who or what to trust anymore.
caerbannog March 21, 2012 at 02:02 PM
Relatively new science? Do you really believe that the foundational work performed by Joseph Fourier, John Tyndall and Svante Arrhenius is "relatively new"? And when you say, "we don't know much about global warming yet", let me correct that. You really should say, "*I* don't know much about global warming yet".


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »